Saturday, December 12, 2009

Have you seen this one yet?
Marriage Penalty Hidden in Health Care Reform
by Kim Trobee, editor
Higher premiums may discourage people from getting married.
A closer look at premium payments in both the House and Senate health care bills shows higher premiums that might discourage couples from tying the knot.
For instance, in the House version, an unmarried couple each making $30,000 a year would pay $1,320 combined each year for private health insurance. If that couple chose to marry, their premium would jump to $12,000 a year, a difference of $10,680.
Allen Quist, a former Minnesota State legislator and current candidate for Congress, discovered the penalty while looking at numbers from the Committees on Ways and Means, Energy & Commerce, and Education & Labor. (Someone has actually read it.)
"This extraordinary penalty people will pay, should they marry, extends all the way from a two-person combined income of $58,280 to $86,640, a spread of $28,360," he wrote in a blog post. "A large number of people fall within this spread. As premiums for private insurance escalate, as expected, the marriage penalty will become substantially larger."
The Senate bill includes a similar penalty.
"The Senate bill stipulates that two unmarried people, 52 years of age, with private insurance and a combined income of $60,000, $30,000 each, will pay a combined cost of $2,483 for medical insurance," Quist wrote. "Should they marry, however, they will pay a combined cost of $11,666 for insurance — a penalty of $9,183 for getting married."
The numbers are based on the government's definition of "poverty level." Those above poverty level will pay higher premiums, and the excess would be redistributed to those in lower income levels.
Quist explains that the government's definitions will play a critical role in whether people will choose to get married.
"'Household' is defined in both bills as including those who can be claimed as dependents for federal income tax purposes, thereby clarifying that adults can avoid the marriage penalty by living together unmarried," he wrote. "The new system provides a huge incentive for doing so."
John Helmberger, CEO of the Minnesota Family Council and Institute, said the middle class will once again take the hit financially.
"This hidden marriage penalty," he said, "hits hardest the very people that are most suffering from the pathologies resulting from the decline of marriage in our culture." (After 45 years of marriage, my husband and I may be forced to get a divorce.)


  1. noooo......more of the moral and ethical decline. As predicted in scripture.

  2. If this Health Care Reform passes its the death knell for America!

  3. More socialism... It doesn't work well in Australia, so why in the world do they think it will work better there? Here, everyone is entitled to a health care card, but we - the taxpayers - PAY for that right. I pay nearly $2,400 a year, while someone on the dole (welfare) waltzes in and out of the emergency room for a common cold or a splinter - because it's FREE! And is the quality, or standard of care worth it? NO!

  4. ANother egregious evil in this disgusting piece of legislation, I'll be sending it to my senators tomorrow!

  5. I am asking for a divorce right now! Just kidding... BUT, Maybe we should just quit our jobs? I can do almost everything on a barter system...

  6. Well, as sick as this leaves me I'll probably die anyway. But boy, my husband's new wife may wanna think twice before hitching up with him! Thanks for the great info!


I really do care what you think. However, if you are rude or use vulgarities, you will be deleted. Let us have an open and intelligent discussion here.